A- de 2000
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz
✓Claimant Enrique Santos Acevedo
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Inaplicación para el caso
- Exceso en la potestad reglamentaria
- Incompetencia para introducir modificaciones al decreto de tutela en materia de competencias
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se inaplicó el numeral 1º del Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 del 2000 por inconstitucional.
En consecuencia, se ordenó remitir el expediente al Juzgado Diecinueve Civil del Circuito de Bogotá, para que asuma el conocimiento de la acción de tutela instaurada por la demandante de la referencia contra la Superintendencia Bancaria.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- R E S U E L V E:
- En el presente caso, INAPLICAR, por inconstitucional el numeral 1º. del artículo 1º del decreto 1382 del 2000. En consecuencia, remítase el expediente al Juzgado Diecinueve Civil del Circuito de Bogotá, para que asuma el conocimiento de la acción de tutela instaurada por la demandante EUNICE SANTOS ACEVEDO, contra la Superintendencia Bancaria.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.